Good news has been relatively rare of late. This was a much appreciated exception. If only the Supreme Court Justices were as honourable as their fellow stack of Trump appointees in the lower courts.
Excellent reporting and straightforward summaries of legal smackdown of the regime personified in one hateful man. I wonder, is there ever a standard reached when the deserved reputation of Trump as a malicious, narcissistic misanthrope can immediately be entered into the record as rationale to uphold counterclaims by defendants in such suits? A picture would suffice for me, but cannot a contention be made by plaintiff that this, uh, ahem, human has such a mountain of evidence as a tortuous claimant be disqualifying in and of itself? It at least persuasive? I would think a summary brief introducing a record of such ridiculous claims would provide a rationale for cause. But then again, I am not an attorney, and haven’t ever played one, like those ‘counselors’ that choose to represent this , ah, err, man.
Thank you for this detailed reporting- I agree that if the corporations and institutions had fought back instead of bowing to Trump we would certainly be in a different place than we are at this time. The courts have held strong against his vendetta and soon Halligan will be out. He will then appoint another unqualified lawyer and he/she will continue to get slapped down by judges. He will never stop because he thrives on bullying and vengeance.
Thank you, Liz, for including all the links. I have a lot of catching up to do. What a brilliant legal bullseye your work provides.
Good news has been relatively rare of late. This was a much appreciated exception. If only the Supreme Court Justices were as honourable as their fellow stack of Trump appointees in the lower courts.
Excellent reporting and straightforward summaries of legal smackdown of the regime personified in one hateful man. I wonder, is there ever a standard reached when the deserved reputation of Trump as a malicious, narcissistic misanthrope can immediately be entered into the record as rationale to uphold counterclaims by defendants in such suits? A picture would suffice for me, but cannot a contention be made by plaintiff that this, uh, ahem, human has such a mountain of evidence as a tortuous claimant be disqualifying in and of itself? It at least persuasive? I would think a summary brief introducing a record of such ridiculous claims would provide a rationale for cause. But then again, I am not an attorney, and haven’t ever played one, like those ‘counselors’ that choose to represent this , ah, err, man.
Thank you for this detailed reporting- I agree that if the corporations and institutions had fought back instead of bowing to Trump we would certainly be in a different place than we are at this time. The courts have held strong against his vendetta and soon Halligan will be out. He will then appoint another unqualified lawyer and he/she will continue to get slapped down by judges. He will never stop because he thrives on bullying and vengeance.
Excellent! He’s cooked! 🫶🏻