10 Comments
User's avatar
Johan's avatar
4hEdited

Bill Kristol saying “Abolish ICE” is the tell. When the architect of the Iraq War thinks your paramilitary force has gone too far, you’ve built something worse than law enforcement…you’ve built a goon squad.

Argentina didn’t reform the ESMA detention center. They closed it and turned it into a museum. Because you don’t reform death squads, you dismantle them.

“Reform and retrain” assumes institutions willing to enforce constraints. Minneapolis proved otherwise. Body cams filmed everything. Regime still lied, defended the killers, blamed the victims. Training doesn’t fix that. Accountability does.

Abolish ICE isn’t radical. It’s pattern recognition.

—Johan

Let’s all keep it real

Lisa Nystrom's avatar

ICE are not law enforcement. What they are doing is not law enforcement. It’s pure thuggery. And it’s time for the Dems to start being honest.😡

noeire's avatar

100% agree. Massive amounts of taxpayer $$ financing daily brutality, not related to law enforcement. This is political repression. Waiting for mid-term elections? What mid-term elections-?? See Fulton County, GA.

Steve Tartaglione's avatar

I believe in defunding the entire department also removing administrative leaders. Never since the start of ICE have we had rogue people running around the country out of control.

Why can all these criminals ( which I believe many are) run this country because of a few crack pots say it’s ok to harass! Defund and start over with well trained people. Many in this group presently are not law enforcement.

Old lady's avatar

He looks like the Israel IDF murderers They are in our government too

Michael Wild's avatar

Much as I’d like to see ICE in its present form destroyed, fighting about slogans over reform vs abolition seems a waste of time. These are questions for a new government and we’re stuck with the present one at the moment. There’s no way bar a violent revolution that ICE is going to be dis-established in this term of government.

Fights amongst those who agree that ICE at present is unacceptable are a waste of time and a benefit for the Republicans. Anger directed at ICE opponents who don’t think shouting “defund ICE” is a good idea are far better directed at the government – especially Trump – who set this monster up and turned it loose. If the left can make enough of this stink to attach to the Republicans they might lose the Senate as well as the House and that would be a significant achievement. Fighting over whether ICE should be reformed or disbanded some years hence is a distraction from this task

Margo Lindsey's avatar

Recently iCE knocked a man to the ground then sprayed a yellow chemical directly into his open mouth and eyes causing agonizing, sustained pain. This horrific act of torture shows there’s no reforming an agency that allows and even celebrates overt violence including the two gruesome murders in Minneapolis. ABOLISH ICE NOW!

Mark In Colorado's avatar

Hearing the lack of strength and directness from the Democrats in Congress, I often think of the song “Harry Truman” by the group Chicago (1975).

The first stanza:

America needs you, Harry Truman

Harry, could you please come home?

Things are looking bad

I know you would be mad

To see what kind of men

Prevail upon the land you love

Second stanza:

America's wondering, "How we got here?"

Harry, all we get is lies

We're getting safer cars

Rocket ships to Mars

From men who'd sell us out

To get themselves a piece of power

[Bridge: Robert Lamm]

We'd love to hear you speak your mind

In plain and simple ways

Call a spade a spade

Just like you did back in the days

When you would play piano

Each morning walk a mile

Speak of what was going down

With honesty and style…

(More lyrics follow)

Koko in AZ's avatar

Why does DHS need more money? They are already operating with more money than ever, including pillaging FEMA funds in the process. I thought DHS had been funded till 2029. Is it those preposterous $50K sign-on bonuses? And, since when is the U.S. in so much "criminal" chaos that this is all needed?

M Apodaca's avatar

Every time you mention that x# of Dems voted for the bill, note that they may have been afraid of the consequences of a government shutdown.